The Dark Knight Rises (2012) - 7/10
Following up one of the most adored superhero films is probably not the easiest task, even for Christopher Nolan. And while I don’t think TDKR is bad, it does suffer under its predecessor’s shadow. But I don't have a lot for the intro here, so let's just get into the rubric.
1. Acting
We might as well kick things off with the film's central role. Christian Bale returns for his third outing as the Caped Crusader—though it’s probably his weakest. It's not necessarily his fault; the script doesn't leave a lot of room for character moments. Still, the performance feels a bit lackluster compared to the other films in the series. It’s not bad acting—just serviceable.
Also returning is Michael Caine as Alfred. Unfortunately for Caine, Alfred gets a pretty early exit from the film's plot. But he does manage to squeak in some solid moments of pathos and cheekiness in the opening 30 minutes. Morgan Freeman also returns as Lucius Fox and similarly mostly serves as a familiar face, with little new material to work with.
One returning face who does get a good amount of work is Gary Oldman as Commissioner Gordon. For Oldman, this is a pretty restrained role, and I appreciate his more nuanced and haunted approach to Gordon. He also gets a lot more interesting character exploration than his fellow castmates, which Oldman carries compellingly.
We do get some new faces joining the series. First is Anne Hathaway as Catwoman. Hathaway seems to have a dedicated group of haters who follow her around, and taking over an iconic character certainly amplifies that. However, I actually like her work here and her take on the character. In particular, Selina has a couple of great code-switch-type moments that give her an almost manic, unpredictable quality. A good example is the opener when she meets Bruce unexpectedly after stealing his fingerprints, or later on when she escapes the police raid during her exchange with Daggett’s men. That said, I don't fully buy her romance with Bruce due to a lack of chemistry with Bale and some unhelpful screenwriting.
Second, we get Marion Cotillard in a sort of dual role as Miranda Tate and Talia al Ghul. Cotillard is a very accomplished actor, but her inclusion is a bit wasted until the end. As Miranda she is a fairly passive character and, similar to Hathaway, has a romance with Bale that doesn't fully click. Her better work comes later, after the reveal of her identity, but even that is mired by a truly horrendous death scene that has become legendary for all the wrong reasons.
Lastly, we have our main villain for most of the story: Tom Hardy as Bane. Hardy has a difficult task here. Not only is Bane distinguishable for his dispassionate demeanor, but his ability to emote is severely diminished due to the facial mask. That really leaves Hardy with two major tools: Bane's physicality and his eyes. From a physical standpoint, I love Hardy’s work. Bane may not match the hyper-muscular depiction from the comics, but Hardy's presence is absolutely intimidating. Everything from his stature to the way he punches shows an unmatchable intensity and power. As for the emotional scenes, Hardy does a lot with a little, using subtle movements and varying eye intensity to relay Bane’s feelings. Lastly, we should talk about the voice. I think this one is really a 50/50 split—you either like it or hate it. I enjoy the somewhat off-kilter quality it brings to the character, but I understand those who find it distracting or weird. Sometimes as an actor, you just have to take a swing.
2. Cinematography
Christopher Nolan and longtime collaborator Wally Pfister return to bring their Batman trilogy to a close. One thing that jumped out to me is how it seems like they wanted to break free from the look of the earlier films. Gone are the dark and moonlit landscapes. Instead, we spend the vast majority of our time in a brightly lit, snowy Gotham. The photography and color grading even look saturated white at times. I'm not sure how intentional that change was, but it certainly separates this film visually.
As for the rest, Nolan's maximization of IMAX cameras and wide angles takes advantage of color and striking stills. I think it’s just his preferred style, but it also evokes the idea of comic book panels and the iconic imagery they can create.
In today's day and age, we may have a harder time distinguishing real from fake, but our brains are very good at noticing when something looks slightly “off.” The extra realism Nolan gets from practical work makes a difference. Plus, as a movie fan, I love the ingenuity and problem solving behind these scenes.
3. Production/Costume Design
This is a mixed bag for me. Some of the assets look incredible. The Batwing, for instance, which many assume is digital, is actually a scale model used on set. It didn't fly, but they strapped it to cranes or mounted it on vehicles to get the shots before manipulating it with CGI.
However, when it comes to the film’s settings, I miss the more gothic appeal of Tim Burton's Gotham or even Nolan's Gotham from Batman Begins. Instead, TDKR utilizes real-world cities such as New York, Chicago, and Pittsburgh as substitutes. My only issue is that there seems to be little interest in altering them to resemble the fictional Gotham City. Instead, we get “generic city.” Similarly, I don't love the Batcave in this version. Gone are the distinctive cave and brick arches from Batman Begins, replaced by a fairly nondescript black platform emerging from water, backed by rocks and a waterfall.
Still, most other sets look great. Many scenes were shot on location, and the scouting team did a great job. Wollaton Hall and the Osterley House as stand-ins for Wayne Manor look fantastic. The Title Insurance Building and 15 Broad Street in New York served well as the Gotham Stock Exchange. L.A.’s Union Station works nicely as a makeshift kangaroo court. And the constructed sets of the Pit prison and Bane's sewer headquarters look incredible. Most films don’t have the budget to travel the world like this, and Nolan and company utilize it well.
4. Writing
On the surface, this is mostly just a decent script. The basic plot: after years of seclusion, Bruce Wayne and Batman are drawn out of pseudo-retirement by a new threat. Bane first appears as a volatile piece in a corporate takeover attempt by a rogue Wayne board member seeking a potentially dangerous technology Bruce has hidden away. As the plot progresses, Bane is revealed to be masterminding a much larger plan targeting Bruce in retribution for killing Ra’s al Ghul. After battling Bane, Batman is defeated and thrown into a secluded prison. Bane refuses to kill him, instead wanting Bruce to watch Gotham be destroyed slowly before a bomb wipes the city out. In the end, Bruce escapes the prison, returns to Gotham, confronts Bane, and after a brief twist revealing the true mastermind, flies the bomb out to sea. Bruce survives but chooses to leave his old life behind.
That in itself is not a bad story. But what Nolan and co-writer Jonathan Nolan excel at is digging into the psychology of their heroes and villains. In fact, I’d argue that’s what they’re most interested in, as the lore and comic book tone of the source material are largely replaced with a grounded, hyper-realistic approach. A few examples help illustrate this.
A straightforward example is Catwoman. When we meet Selina Kyle, she’s incredibly duplicitous. In her very first moments, she masquerades as a sheepish maid during a charity gala. When confronted by Bruce, she instantly drops the meek demeanor and switches into master-thief mode. As the plot progresses, we learn Selina is a lifelong thief with an enormous rap sheet and a growing list of people who want her dead. She pretends to revel in the uprising of the powerless over the powerful, telling Bruce:
“There’s a storm coming, Mr. Wayne… you’re all gonna wonder how you ever thought you could live so large and leave so little for the rest of us.”
However, despite her dubious side, we also see a softer Selina—someone who desperately wants a way out and a clean slate. She seems like someone forced into a life of crime and then trapped in it. She’s almost the opposite side of Bruce’s coin, as he seems unable to let Batman go. In the end, Selina not only gets her clean slate but leaves crime behind.
While I wouldn't call this Oscar-worthy writing, it's above-average for the action genre, and its prioritization over plot—at least in parallel with the action—is well done.
Most characters get an arc. Alfred feels responsible for Bruce’s isolation because his lies trapped Bruce in extended mourning. When Bruce wants to return to being Batman, Alfred fears part of him may no longer want to live, and finally reveals the truth about Rachel. His exit is self-sacrificial—a desperate attempt to make Bruce walk away, which initially fails but pays off later.
As for the villains, Bane and Talia are more of a pair on a conjoined path. Choosing Bane was not a mistake. Bane is a masked man with great physical prowess, trained by Ra’s al Ghul, and on a mission likely to cost him his life. It's no coincidence that the pit prison resembles the well Bruce once fell into. They are divergent reflections of each other. Where Bruce rejected the League of Shadows, the League rejected Bane. Where Bruce had a mission of justice, Bane had a mission of revenge. Where Bruce had Rachel urging him to give up Batman, Bane had Talia—who used his affection to advance her own revenge. Bane lives in constant pain with only a mask to keep it at bay. In many ways, so does Bruce. Talia's character is simpler; Bane is her figurehead while she masquerades as Miranda, blinded by her desire for revenge.
There’s more we could cover, especially regarding Gordon’s inner turmoil about letting Batman take the fall for Harvey Dent. But we should talk about Bruce. We join him after eight years of isolation. At the end of TDK, he and Gordon “won” by covering up the truth. They inspired Gotham to take back the city, but at a cost: Bruce lost the love of his life, failed Harvey and Gotham by choosing Rachel over his mission, and lost Batman by making him the villain instead of Harvey. From the beginning, Bruce envisioned a day when he could walk away once Gotham was safe. Instead, the symbol meant to inspire was corrupted. So when it comes time to bring Batman back, part of Bruce wants to die because he believes he has nothing left to live for. This is why Bane defeats him so brutally: Bane uses pain to fuel his purpose, while Bruce’s pain weakens him. When Bane leaves him in the pit, Bruce is spiritually and physically broken. His escape represents rediscovering something worth living for; his fear of death is what helps him climb out. In the end, Bruce redeems himself and Batman. The only thing left is to leave Batman behind and begin anew as Bruce.
Overall, while this is not my favorite of Nolan's Batman films, it still bears many of his creative marks. His attention to character and ability to balance it with spectacle is clear. The only real issues are that it's a bit too busy for its own good—and it’s not The Dark Knight.
5. Sound Design
Nolan loves having a near-continuous score throughout his films. Almost every scene features music highlighting tone and intensity. While it may not be as iconic as Elfman’s version, Hans Zimmer’s theme has carved out its own legacy, matching Nolan’s darker take on the character.
That said, this film doesn't have a vastly different musical identity from its predecessors—we're mostly retreading the same themes.
Apart from the score, the sound effects are great, though Bane’s voice often sticks out since it was clearly dubbed in post. This was likely due to difficulty recording Hardy on set and was the best compromise.
6. Editing
I like how Nolan integrates scenes together. It’s common for multiple scenes to happen simultaneously while using audio (music or voiceover) to bridge them. This movie clocks in at 164 minutes, and I can't imagine how much longer it would be with a more conventional editing approach.
Sometimes this is called elliptical editing—cutting out extraneous time to maximize efficiency and pacing. Others might call it a spin on montage. Either way, the style keeps the film feeling like it's always moving and ties parallel story beats together for thematic cohesion.
7. Visual Effects
I covered much of this under cinematography. The benefit here—and why the film doesn't look like it relies heavily on CGI—is that the VFX team had extensive reference material. Instead of building assets and backgrounds from scratch, they enhanced existing footage. It’s more streamlined and sells the illusion better.
8. Originality or Strength of Adaptation
While this is not a direct adaptation of A Tale of Two Cities, Nolan has stated that Dickens’ novel was a major inspiration for TDKR. It’s a lofty goal to blend classical literature with comic books, but the result speaks for itself. Ultimately, this is a superhero movie—but a high-quality one.
9. Stunt Coordination
This is a mixed bag. On one hand, you have incredible sequences like the airplane opener, which is ambitious and expertly executed. On the other hand, there’s a rooftop fight where background stunt actors literally fall over without anyone hitting them. Similarly, you have incredible chase sequences—like Batman pursuing Bane after the stock exchange heist—alongside a somewhat awkward, poorly choreographed police-vs.-mercenaries brawl at the climax. I understand Nolan wanted hyper-realism, but it sometimes makes things look silly or amateurish.
10. Direction
I've already mentioned Christopher Nolan a lot because he is heavily involved in nearly every part of his films. TDKR may not be his greatest work, but it's still miles ahead of most directors in ambition and execution.
Legacy / Final Thoughts
TDKR is a fitting end to Nolan’s Batman trilogy, even if it’s my least favorite of the three. Unfortunately, it shares the fate of many third installments that can't live up to their predecessors. It bears a striking resemblance to Return of the Jedi, which had the difficult task of following The Empire Strikes Back. Nonetheless, it’s an excellent example of elevated blockbuster filmmaking and is part of a trilogy that drastically changed audience perception of what superhero movies could be.
Comments
Post a Comment